Based on the information provided, it appears that redrawing a copyrighted image can be considered copyright infringement, depending on the specific circumstances. If the redrawn image is an exact or near-exact copy of the original, it would likely be considered an infringement, as the new work does not contain enough original expression to qualify as a separate, non-infringing work. However, if the redrawn image is a loose interpretation or transformation of the original, where the artist has added their own creative expression, it may be considered a fair use or a derivative work, which could be permissible.
The key factors in determining whether a redrawn image constitutes copyright infringement include the purpose and character of the use (e.g., commercial vs. non-commercial, transformative vs. non-transformative), the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. In some cases, even if an artist sets out to create an exact copy, they may have a fair use defense if the new work is used for a transformative purpose, such as political commentary or education.