Create photorealistic images of your products in any environment without expensive photo shoots! (Get started for free)

AI Image Generation vs Getty Images 7 Key Differences in Celebrity Photo Licensing and Usage

AI Image Generation vs Getty Images 7 Key Differences in Celebrity Photo Licensing and Usage - Getty Images Watermark Protection vs AI Generated Photo Rights

Getty Images' foray into AI image generation signifies a pivotal moment in the evolving landscape of image rights. They're attempting to carve out a distinct position in the market, specifically addressing concerns around copyright and ownership that arise with the proliferation of freely available AI-generated content. Their AI tool relies on their massive library of copyrighted images, aiming to ensure that any AI-generated images produced through their platform are legally sound. This approach is in stark contrast to the more open, and possibly legally precarious, approaches found in other AI image generation tools.

The ongoing legal battles surrounding AI image generation, such as Getty's own suit against Stability AI, are a testament to the significant ambiguities surrounding AI image ownership. This is particularly relevant for ecommerce, where product visuals are a crucial element. The question of whether an AI-generated image infringes on existing copyrights is a serious issue. Businesses looking to leverage AI for generating product images need to carefully consider the ramifications of using such content.

Getty's initiative represents a significant step towards establishing a framework for responsible and legally compliant AI image generation. Their watermarked images, combined with their ongoing legal action, act as a signal for the ecommerce industry to engage with these issues. Navigating this new era demands a deeper understanding of the complexities of image rights and the potential pitfalls of using unvetted AI-generated content for product images. Ultimately, the balance between innovation and respecting intellectual property is crucial to creating a sustainable environment for both image creators and users.

Getty Images is taking a proactive stance against the potential threat of AI-generated images to their vast library. They've developed a generative AI tool that, unlike many others, is built upon their own copyrighted images. This ensures that the new AI-generated images are legally sound, reducing the risk of copyright infringement. They're essentially using their existing intellectual property as the foundation for this new technology.

This approach also utilizes robust watermarking to protect their images, making it hard to remove the visual indicators of ownership. This reinforces their rights and discourages unauthorized use. Their commitment to this approach is shown by the lawsuit they filed against Stability AI, highlighting the legal battles that are likely to continue as AI image generation matures.

While some AI platforms try to skirt copyright issues, Getty Images and platforms like Adobe Firefly are focused on using only legally obtained images for their AI training. However, the speed of development of these AI image tools can outpace legal frameworks. This creates a risk that businesses might unknowingly infringe upon existing copyrights, leading to legal battles and reputational damage.

The traditional copyright landscape is designed around human creators, but AI-generated images don't quite fit into that paradigm. The rights and ownership of images made purely by algorithms are unclear. It's possible we'll see new licensing models emerge to bridge the gap between traditional stock photo businesses and the new world of AI-generated art.

In the evolving e-commerce world, AI is being used to enhance product images in ways previously unimaginable. However, this convenience should be balanced with the need to understand the legal implications. Using AI-generated images for product staging, for example, could open companies up to liability if they haven't been properly sourced. It's becoming increasingly important for businesses to understand copyright and ensure their AI practices don't inadvertently infringe upon the rights of others.

AI Image Generation vs Getty Images 7 Key Differences in Celebrity Photo Licensing and Usage - Commercial Usage Terms Between AI Models and Getty Stock Photos

The rise of AI image generation has introduced a new layer of complexity when it comes to how businesses use images commercially, especially in areas like product visuals. Getty Images, a major player in stock photography, has responded to this by launching a generative AI tool. Their approach emphasizes using properly licensed images to train their AI, aiming to reduce copyright concerns when generating new images. This contrasts with other AI models that haven't always placed a strong emphasis on legally sound content. This difference in approach highlights a key issue in the field: the need to balance innovation in AI image creation with the protection of established copyright laws. It's becoming increasingly important for businesses that use AI-generated images for product visuals or staging to understand the legal implications of their actions to prevent potential infringement on existing copyright protections. The legal landscape surrounding AI-generated content is still evolving, with questions of ownership and responsibility constantly coming to the forefront. It's an ongoing process to ensure both technological advancements and copyright protection can exist together in a healthy way.

AI image generation tools often learn from massive collections of existing images, but they might not always grasp the nuances of copyright law. This can unintentionally lead to the creation of images that echo copyrighted works without proper permission. Getty Images has taken a different path, building their AI on their existing library of licensed photos. They're hoping this approach will head off legal trouble while still promoting creative product visuals.

The issue of licensing with AI-generated content gets more complex when you consider that algorithms can produce images almost identical to those found in human-made stock photo libraries. This brings up tough questions regarding originality and ownership, particularly for businesses selling online.

The watermarks Getty uses in their AI images are more than just a security feature. They act as a crucial legal tool to protect their intellectual property, making it easier to identify and stop unauthorized use. This underscores the importance of using technology to safeguard copyrights.

Traditional stock photography has clear ownership paths, but AI-generated images often lack this traceable history. This lack of clarity can put e-commerce businesses in a vulnerable spot if they accidentally use an image that infringes on a copyright.

The way we think about copyright hasn't caught up to the rapid advancements in AI. This means companies relying on AI for product images are operating in a zone of uncertainty, potentially facing lawsuits as laws evolve to address these new technologies.

There are potential problems with selling AI-generated images online. Buyers might not fully understand the rights and ownership associated with them, potentially leading to disputes about what was bought and how the images can be used.

Businesses using AI for product staging must be mindful of the implications for identity and authenticity. Unlike human models, AI-generated people aren't real, and that could potentially mislead consumers and damage a brand's reputation.

Generating product images with AI can be significantly faster than traditional methods, but the unique legal landscape associated with these images requires businesses to invest more time understanding compliance and managing usage rights.

The swift advancements in AI image generation highlight a need to rethink copyright law. Current rules might not be well-suited to the unique nature of content generated by algorithms, which could leave gaps in the legal protection of both creators and consumers.

AI Image Generation vs Getty Images 7 Key Differences in Celebrity Photo Licensing and Usage - Image Resolution and Quality Comparison in Product Photography

In the world of e-commerce, where product visuals are crucial, the quality and resolution of images play a pivotal role in attracting customers and driving sales. The emergence of AI image generation tools has presented both opportunities and challenges in this domain. While these tools allow for fast and adaptable image creation, the quality of the outputs can vary significantly compared to traditionally sourced photos, especially from established sources like Getty Images. Achieving the ideal balance between speed and visual fidelity is crucial.

Maintaining a high-resolution output ensures that product details are clearly visible, leading to greater consumer confidence and engagement. However, using AI-generated images also requires consideration for other factors such as brand image and copyright. If an image is too artificial or doesn't meet consumer expectations for detail, it could potentially negatively impact a brand's reputation or lead to legal issues.

As AI image generation continues to advance, navigating the intersection of technology, aesthetics, and legal considerations becomes ever more critical for businesses. Ensuring that the quality of the imagery meets the demands of both e-commerce consumers and the evolving legal landscape surrounding AI-generated content is paramount for businesses using this technology. The ability to balance the promise of speedy image generation with ensuring the output is both visually appealing and legally compliant is becoming a defining aspect of product photography in the digital age.

The quality of product images, especially in the context of e-commerce, relies heavily on image resolution, which is essentially the level of detail captured in a picture. This detail is directly related to pixel density, measured in pixels per inch (PPI). Higher pixel density usually means sharper images, which can greatly impact how customers perceive a product. Studies suggest that image quality significantly drops below a certain PPI, often around 72 for digital screens. This can make a product look less appealing or even raise doubts about its authenticity, potentially harming sales.

While AI tools can create product visuals rapidly, compression used to speed up loading times can create noticeable artifacts or a loss of detail, impacting the overall visual presentation. However, AI can also be used to create realistic product settings and environments, which can be crucial for making a product look appealing. The effectiveness of this 'staging' relies on the image resolution, as higher resolution allows for more subtle details like shadows and textures to be rendered, enhancing the image's quality.

High-resolution images are important because they can accurately capture subtle color variations, which can be critical for many products. Accurate colors can build trust and satisfaction for shoppers. However, producing these high-resolution images can take more time and processing power from AI generators, which can be a challenge for e-commerce businesses that need fast turnaround times.

Interestingly, some platforms now adapt the resolution of product images depending on the device being used to view them. This helps to ensure the best viewing experience for users on different devices, like smartphones or tablets, where screen sizes and network speeds vary greatly.

AI-generated images, especially when they try to use human models, can sometimes feel artificial, and this difference from real-life visuals can impact consumer satisfaction, especially for products focused on lifestyle aspects. High-resolution can help make these images seem more authentic and detailed.

Furthermore, there are legal implications related to image quality. Low-quality, AI-generated images may inadvertently replicate existing trademarks or copyrighted works due to the nature of how AI tools learn from datasets. Businesses using AI for their product imagery need to understand how resolution and quality can impact their legal compliance.

Consumers have a strong preference for high-resolution images online, with over 70% expressing a preference for sharp, detailed visuals when shopping. This consumer behavior shows that a direct link exists between image quality and the chances of making a sale, emphasizing the importance of image resolution in successful product photography.

AI Image Generation vs Getty Images 7 Key Differences in Celebrity Photo Licensing and Usage - Pricing Models Getty Premium Content vs AI Image Generators

The emergence of AI image generation has shifted the landscape of image pricing, with Getty Images leading the charge with their Generative AI tool. This tool offers a subscription model, priced at $14.99 for 100 AI-generated images, targeting smaller businesses seeking affordable stock photo solutions. Getty's approach is distinct, aiming to leverage its vast library of licensed content to generate commercially safe images through AI, while attempting to stay within the boundaries of copyright. This contrasts with the more open-ended approach of other AI image generators. While this provides a potential solution for businesses needing quick and affordable images, it also introduces a different set of concerns. The quality of the AI-generated images might not always be as consistent or high as those from traditional stock photo sources. Ultimately, as AI image generation evolves, businesses must carefully consider the pricing structures, understand the potential copyright issues, and weigh the image quality against the speed and accessibility of AI generation for their products. The legal and commercial implications are still unfolding, and new licensing models are likely to emerge to address this dynamic environment.

Getty Images' foray into AI image generation presents an interesting contrast to the traditional stock photo model they've long championed. Their AI tool, powered by NVIDIA technology, offers a subscription-based approach to image creation, charging $14.99 for 100 generated images. This model is a significant departure from their typical licensing tiers and suggests a move towards a more dynamic, potentially demand-driven, pricing structure. This is a significant change, as established models generally involve set prices based on image usage and licensing type.

The rise of AI image generators has the potential to dramatically shift the landscape of commercial imagery. Predictions suggest that AI-generated content could dominate a significant portion of the market in the coming years, posing a potential challenge to traditional stock photo providers like Getty. It's a fascinating time to watch the industry dynamics unfold and see if providers like Getty can maintain their relevance and user base.

While AI offers the allure of fast and inexpensive image creation, a key consideration is the potential trade-off in quality. The emphasis on speed and volume in many AI image generation tools might not always meet the visual standards that businesses, particularly those dealing with high-value products, have come to expect from platforms like Getty. This begs the question of whether the cost savings outweigh the potential sacrifice in visual quality, particularly for brands focused on high-end product representation.

Furthermore, while the cost and speed advantages of AI are appealing, consumer perception remains an important factor. Studies suggest that many consumers still prefer photos from professional photographers, implying that a reliance on AI-generated images for all product visuals could potentially compromise a brand's image. This dynamic introduces an intriguing tension between the allure of quick, affordable content and the potential risks to brand perception.

Getty's various licensing options, including exclusive rights, can be quite valuable for businesses that require legally sound and unique content. This aspect of their model is in contrast to many AI tools that generally offer simpler licensing agreements, sometimes with less clarity on usage rights. This can create challenges for businesses, especially when attempting to navigate potential issues arising from AI-generated content that might accidentally mimic or infringe on copyrighted work. AI image licensing is in its infancy, and understanding the nuances can be tricky.

The licensing of AI-generated content can be quite intricate. Since AI models are trained on vast image datasets, there's an inherent risk that generated images could inadvertently resemble protected content, leading to complex copyright disputes. Getty's reliance on their own vast library of licensed content, on the other hand, aims to alleviate some of these risks, allowing them to have a clearer path in terms of legal rights. This contrasts with the more ambiguous territory many businesses find themselves in when using AI for image generation.

One intriguing concern with AI-generated content is the possibility of bias. Depending on the data used to train AI models, they can sometimes produce outputs that are culturally insensitive or reflect pre-existing biases. This issue doesn't typically arise with curated content platforms like Getty Images, which put in effort to curate and actively manage their content to avoid such pitfalls.

Another aspect to consider is the dynamic legal environment surrounding AI-generated content. As legal frameworks struggle to catch up with the rapid pace of technological development, businesses that rely on AI for images might find themselves in legally precarious territory. This rapid evolution of legal boundaries around AI-generated content presents a risk that's not readily apparent in established stock photo platforms like Getty.

AI image generators can create quite realistic product staging scenarios, bringing immersive and engaging environments into product visuals. However, they still struggle to replicate the creative nuances and finesse of a professional photographer's touch, especially for high-end product representation. This human touch in creative visual elements remains a significant factor in visual storytelling and product depiction.

Finally, there's the ongoing question of output resolution. The speed and efficiency of AI image generation often come with limitations on output quality. Factors like processing power or the AI model's architecture can affect the achievable resolution. This isn't typically an issue with Getty, as they maintain a commitment to high-resolution standards for their stock photography. This difference in image quality can be an important point of consideration for businesses, especially for products requiring high levels of detail.

In essence, Getty Images' approach to AI image generation offers a unique blend of traditional stock photo principles and emerging AI capabilities. This positions them distinctly within the evolving landscape of image creation and consumption. The long-term implications of this dual approach are yet to be seen, but it promises to be an interesting evolution of the visual content industry.

AI Image Generation vs Getty Images 7 Key Differences in Celebrity Photo Licensing and Usage - Copyright Protection Methods in Getty vs AI Image Generation

The rise of AI image generation has introduced a new layer of complexity to the world of copyright, especially for e-commerce businesses that rely on strong product visuals. Getty Images, a prominent player in stock photography, is responding to this by using its extensive collection of licensed photos as the foundation for its own AI image generator. This approach is meant to limit the risks of copyright infringement that can arise when AI tools are trained on vast, and potentially unvetted, collections of images. This proactive stance stands in contrast to some other AI image generators that haven't always prioritized legal compliance. The legal battles, exemplified by Getty's lawsuit against Stability AI, highlight the need for clarity around ownership and responsibility for AI-generated content. E-commerce businesses that utilize AI for product images are facing a growing need to be aware of these issues. Striking a balance between leveraging the speed and cost benefits of AI generation and ensuring compliance with copyright law is crucial to prevent potential disputes and reputational damage. The legal framework surrounding AI-generated imagery is still under development, and the ongoing discussions and lawsuits signal a crucial phase where businesses need to carefully consider their use of AI-generated product images.

Here's a rewrite of the provided text, keeping a similar length and style, focused on ecommerce product images and AI image generation:

Getty Images' foray into AI image generation has created a fascinating clash between established copyright practices and the relatively new world of algorithmically created visuals. This is particularly interesting when you think about how product images are so important for ecommerce. Getty's approach, unlike many other AI image generators, relies heavily on their own licensed library of images. They've incorporated advanced watermarking techniques to try to make sure their images aren't misused and have built their AI training datasets on this foundation of legal ownership. This helps to differentiate them, as many other AI models simply scrape images from the web without careful consideration of copyright.

It's an intriguing contrast to how most AI tools operate, where ownership of the resulting images is a bit hazy. Getty, on the other hand, has decades of experience with image licensing agreements, and this experience shows in their approach to AI image generation. They've clearly laid out what rights users get when they buy images generated by their tool.

The consumer perspective is interesting here. Studies have shown that people generally trust professionally shot photos more than AI-generated ones. This might be something to consider if you're an ecommerce business looking to leverage AI for product images. Do your customers value authenticity and quality, or would they be okay with images that are quickly generated?

Also, it's a new ballgame in terms of pricing. Getty's switch to a subscription model for AI-generated images is a big shift from their usual tiered pricing based on image licensing. While it makes things easier for smaller businesses, it leaves open questions about how this model will work long-term and if it will affect the quality of images they can offer.

Further, AI image generators can be influenced by the datasets they're trained on. If there's bias in the dataset, there's a chance that AI-generated images could reinforce existing stereotypes. Getty's approach of carefully curating their library of content is designed to limit this problem.

The legal implications are very important here. Getty's case against Stability AI is a clear example of the kind of uncertainty that exists with AI-generated images. These legal battles will likely establish important precedents that will impact how image rights are treated in the future. It's vital for ecommerce businesses to be aware of these ongoing issues.

Image resolution can also be a challenge. AI tools can sometimes struggle to generate images with the same level of detail that professional photographers achieve. Getty, with their history in professional photography, maintains a high standard, and this can be an important differentiator for businesses that want to showcase their products in the best possible light.

Additionally, there's a big liability concern if you use AI-generated content. If your product images accidentally look too much like existing copyrighted images, you could end up in a legal battle. Getty's approach attempts to mitigate these risks by controlling the training data for their AI tools.

There's still a debate about how originality fits into the AI world. AI models can sometimes produce results that are uncannily similar to existing works, raising questions about copyright infringement and the definition of creative inspiration. This is a critical consideration for ecommerce companies that want to use AI to create unique product images that stand out.

In summary, the legal and ethical landscape of AI-generated content is in a constant state of flux. Getty's initiative, however, shows a proactive attempt to balance innovation with respect for existing copyright norms. This has implications for how e-commerce businesses use AI for product imaging, prompting them to carefully evaluate the costs and benefits in light of the legal and consumer perspectives. The future of AI-generated images in ecommerce is full of intriguing questions and possibilities.

AI Image Generation vs Getty Images 7 Key Differences in Celebrity Photo Licensing and Usage - Model Release Requirements Getty Images vs AI Celebrity Creation

The increasing use of AI in generating images has brought a new set of challenges to model release requirements, particularly when it comes to celebrities. Getty Images, a leader in the image industry, has responded by creating a revised model release form that considers how biometric data is used in AI and machine learning. This updated release is designed to make sure that using biometric data complies with current privacy laws.

Traditionally, using a celebrity's image in a commercial setting would require specific permission from them. However, with AI-generated images, things get more complicated. The rights and permissions become less clear-cut, making the process more complex.

It's essential for companies, especially those selling products online, to fully understand the differences between using traditional celebrity photos and AI-generated ones. Using AI to create celebrity-like images without adhering to new regulations could result in legal issues. Companies need to understand the shifting legal landscape when it comes to the use of AI-generated images, particularly in cases where the subject matter involves individuals, like celebrities, who have a public profile.

Navigating this new space requires an understanding of these complexities, and this includes understanding what legal protections Getty Images has built into their system versus the looser standards present in many other AI generators. If ecommerce businesses intend to utilize AI in creating product visuals or other content, paying close attention to model release requirements and how those differ from more conventional celebrity photo licensing agreements becomes crucial. Failure to do so could lead to unforeseen legal or reputational challenges.

Getty Images' move into AI image generation highlights a fascinating tension between traditional copyright and the emerging world of AI-created visuals, especially concerning the use of celebrity likenesses in product images for ecommerce. Getty's approach stands out because it centers on its vast library of licensed images, using this foundation to train its AI and create legally sound output. Unlike many other AI image tools that might pull images from the web without much regard for copyright, Getty's approach emphasizes a legally compliant path, which is vital for the business world.

When using traditional photos of celebrities, the rights and licensing are generally clear. However, the use of AI to generate images that mimic a real person introduces a lot of questions about ownership and rights. It's not clear who owns the AI-generated image, which creates uncertainty for those who might use them commercially.

AI models are trained on enormous amounts of data, and this data can include subtle biases present in the original images. While Getty's AI relies on a carefully curated library, which minimizes these risks, AI tools that train on less vetted collections can generate images that are problematic in ways that stock photos generally aren't.

The legal landscape is currently developing rapidly. Getty's lawsuit against Stability AI provides a good illustration of the ambiguities surrounding the legal framework for AI-generated images. As this area continues to develop, it'll establish significant precedents that will change how we think about copyright in the future, and this is especially important for ecommerce businesses using AI-generated images.

Research has consistently shown that people tend to trust human-made images more than AI-generated ones. This creates a hurdle for companies that use AI-generated images in ecommerce, as they need to consider how this preference impacts their brand image and ultimately, sales. If authenticity is vital to a brand, AI-generated images might not be the best option.

Getty's subscription model for their AI image generator is a major departure from the typical tiered pricing model used for licensing photos. This change can alter how businesses budget for images. There's a question of how this new model will evolve in the long term, especially concerning image quality and the availability of options.

AI tools have different capabilities concerning image detail and resolution compared to professional photographers. This is especially significant for ecommerce because consumers often judge the quality of products based on how they appear in images. If product images aren't as sharp or detailed as they are on Getty Images, for example, it could lead to a negative perception of the products being sold.

While AI-generated images of celebrities circumvent model releases, which are mandatory for human models, there's still a risk that companies could face legal action if the images resemble a copyrighted work or trademark. This means that, even with AI, companies need to be careful with the images they choose to use for their products.

Licensing agreements for AI-generated images aren't as clearly defined as for traditional stock photos. This can lead to unintended copyright violations because it's hard to determine exactly how and where an AI-generated image can be used. The lack of clarity introduces challenges and a greater potential for conflict in this area.

The speed and flexibility of AI image generators can be tempting, but the resulting images might not always be up to the standard of a professionally-created image. This issue has implications for a company's brand image in ecommerce, where quality visuals are key. Maintaining brand consistency and quality is crucial for long-term success.

The realm of AI-generated images is in a state of change, and these aspects are just a few of the things companies need to think about when considering the use of this technology. Getty's approach suggests a potential pathway toward a future where AI can be used in a manner that both encourages innovation and respects copyright laws. The interplay between AI and image rights will shape the future of ecommerce and how products are presented online.

AI Image Generation vs Getty Images 7 Key Differences in Celebrity Photo Licensing and Usage - Usage Guidelines for Product Marketing and Ecommerce Applications

The rise of AI image generation has fundamentally altered the landscape of product marketing and e-commerce, making it crucial to understand the evolving usage guidelines for these new visual assets. Companies now have the ability to create a vast array of product visuals quickly and efficiently using AI, but this capability also presents a new set of challenges. Maintaining compliance with existing copyright laws becomes trickier when AI can produce images that are remarkably similar to existing copyrighted material. Furthermore, consumers are increasingly demanding transparency regarding whether products are using AI-generated content, favoring authenticity in their shopping experiences. This need for clarity creates a tension for businesses: on one hand, they can leverage AI to scale their visual marketing efforts, but on the other, they risk alienating customers if they're not transparent or fail to follow legal guidelines.

As a result, it's critical for companies to develop a robust understanding of the constantly changing rules and regulations related to using AI-generated images for ecommerce. The goal is to strike a balance – harnessing the creative power of AI for fast and efficient product visuals while minimizing any potential legal or reputational issues. This requires developing a clear strategy for identifying when AI is being used and implementing it in a way that maintains the brand's desired visual aesthetic across all marketing channels. Ultimately, the success of using AI in ecommerce will rely on both its capabilities and how well companies navigate the evolving legal landscape around using AI-generated content.

The way we create and use images, especially for selling things online, is changing rapidly thanks to AI. The legal side of things is still figuring itself out, as shown by cases like Getty Images suing Stability AI. This is super important for ecommerce, because using AI-generated images without understanding the rules could cause big problems. One of the biggest things is model releases. When you use a real person's picture in ads, you need their permission. But with AI, you can make images that look like someone without needing their okay. This introduces tricky legal questions, especially with celebrities.

Getty is being smart about this by updating their model release forms. They're thinking about how AI uses things like biometric data, making sure they follow the newest privacy laws. Many other AI tools aren't as careful. Another interesting thing is that people still seem to trust photos taken by actual photographers more than AI-generated ones. So, if you're trying to sell products online, you might want to think about whether your customers really want the super-fast, AI-made pictures or if they'd prefer something that looks more genuine.

While AI is great for making images fast, it often doesn't get as much detail as a pro photographer would. This can be a problem if your products need to look super high-quality, especially in a marketplace where everyone is trying to stand out. And AI can sometimes pick up on weird biases from the images it's learned from. This means that sometimes, images produced by AI can have stereotypes or other unwanted things that could damage a brand's image. Companies need to be careful about this risk.

The way businesses pay for images is also changing. Getty used to have a more complex system of pricing, but now they're going with a subscription model for their AI-generated pictures. It's easier for smaller companies, but it makes you wonder how image quality will stay consistent. AI-generated images can also look a lot like existing copyrighted pictures, which is a major legal concern. It's not always obvious who owns the rights to an image generated by an algorithm. These questions are very important for ecommerce businesses who want to make sure they're not accidentally breaking the law.

Some interesting things are happening on the tech side as well. Certain platforms now automatically adjust the quality of images depending on the device you're using to look at them. This is a pretty useful feature for customers, particularly in mobile shopping, where internet speeds and screen sizes are very different. The way AI images are licensed is still complicated. It's not always clear how and where you can use them. This lack of clarity can cause businesses to accidentally break copyright rules, which could lead to problems. Overall, while AI image generation is super exciting and useful, the legal and ethical sides of it are complex and are still changing. Getty's efforts show us a possible path forward where we can have cool AI tools and respect existing laws. How this plays out in ecommerce will really shape the future of how we see and buy products online.